<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>To be specific, the relationship issue I had a hard time with was the association between the image metadata and the image. Here's my question on StackExchange:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49322804/optional-related-doctrine-entity-onetoone-relationship/49323307">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49322804/optional-related-doctrine-entity-onetoone-relationship/49323307</a></div><div><br></div><div>I think the data would be easier to work with as a bi-directional relationship.</div><div><br></div><div>Tac</div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 9:14 AM Tac Tacelosky <<a href="mailto:tacman@gmail.com">tacman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>I also worked on one last year, using Symfony4 and Doctrine (php7, etc.)<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/tacman/dkweb" target="_blank">https://github.com/tacman/dkweb</a></div><div><br></div><div>The biggest challenge of using an ORM was the way some relationships were set up, causing thousands of queries to list. Still, the database was fast enough to support it. Now I'd probably use a real full-text search service, like Elastica, which I'm using on other projects.</div><div><br></div><div>The other challenge was using a remote database, the tradeoff between having super-fast local access v. web-based access. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Finally, as mentioned here, there's the issue of users and permissions. Although pretty standard, it gets messy to add.</div><div><br></div><div>Happy to revive the project and work with others if there's interest. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Tac</div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:39 PM Gilles Caulier <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">hi,<div><br></div><div>Go on github, and search "digikam" There are at least 3 projects for a web interface. I never experienced this...</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/mehdilauters/digikamWebUi" target="_blank">https://github.com/mehdilauters/digikamWebUi</a><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/lbovet/phpdigikam" target="_blank">https://github.com/lbovet/phpdigikam</a><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/siedentop/DigikamWeb" target="_blank">https://github.com/siedentop/DigikamWeb</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le dim. 7 avr. 2019 à 03:01, Daniel Fenn <<a href="mailto:danielx386@gmail.com" target="_blank">danielx386@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Would it be worth looking into this again? Much of the database schema is already there, may need to add 2 tables for users and permissions. After that all that is needed is some decent PHP, CSS, HTML and some jquery coding and as someone else said in the comments one would have a killer app that could be a real game changer.</div><div><br></div><div>I already have some codes sitting around that deals with template systems, auth etc.<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:25 AM woenx <<a href="mailto:marcpalaus@hotmail.com" target="_blank">marcpalaus@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I think it would be great to have a web interface as a quick way to search<br>
for pictures in your catalog, even if it's read only. That way, you could<br>
use Digikam to catalog everything, and the web interface for when you want<br>
to find one specific picture quickly, even in your phone, by folder, tags,<br>
date, or by the people in it. But that sounds like a lot of work. Actually,<br>
someone back in 2005 already proposed this feature:<br>
<a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108873" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108873</a><br>
<br>
I personally use Filerun (<a href="https://filerun.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://filerun.com/</a>) for this purpose, which is<br>
self-hosted and free for personal use. It can read the metadata in pictures<br>
and you can search by date and tags, and more importantly, uses current<br>
directory trees, so you don't have to copy or move any pictures.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Sent from: <a href="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>