<div dir="ltr">It's enabled. I had written a great response to Andrew, but it's caught up in the moderation queue because I attached a couple of screenshot images. :(<div><br></div><div>Long story short, you can use the entire forum as a mailing list if you want (even just specific categories only). The only thing we haven't turned on yet is starting new topics by email, but we're probably going to soon.</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:08 PM Leo Gaspard <<a href="mailto:digikam-users@leo.gaspard.io">digikam-users@leo.gaspard.io</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I haven't checked this one in particular, but in Discourse in general<br>
there is an option in the preferences to turn on mailing list<br>
mode. Unless it's been disabled by the admins, I don't know.<br>
<br>
Andrew Goodbody <<a href="mailto:ajg02@elfringham.co.uk" target="_blank">ajg02@elfringham.co.uk</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> OK, I have just been playing about with <a href="https://discuss.pixls.us/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://discuss.pixls.us/</a><br>
> My problem with it is mainly that it seems to be just a forum. I can <br>
> find no way to subscribe to a category in order to get emails for new <br>
> topics. This makes it a pull only website. That is too much trouble for <br>
> me. I need push so that things I want to know about get sent to me and <br>
> land in my email inbox. I have better things to do than visit a bunch of <br>
> websites, click refresh on each and try to work out what has changed.<br>
><br>
> Or am I missing something?<br>
><br>
> Otherwise it all looks good. There is useful stuff on there.<br>
><br>
> Andrew<br>
><br>
> On 24/01/2019 08:02, Mica Semrick wrote:<br>
>> We'd love to have all you wonderful people on <a href="http://pixls.us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">pixls.us</a>! I'd like to <br>
>> think we are a less creepy platform than LinkedIn as well. We have the <br>
>> social login feature and a bunch of good people!<br>
>> <br>
>> - mica<br>
>> <br>
>> On January 23, 2019 11:34:10 PM PST, Stefan Mueller <br>
>> <<a href="mailto:stefan.mueller.83@gmail.com" target="_blank">stefan.mueller.83@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> @Gilles Caulier <mailto:<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> what do you think<br>
>> about <a href="http://pixel.us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">pixel.us</a> <<a href="http://pixel.us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pixel.us</a>><br>
>> @Simon Frei, writing is a bit more comfortable in the app but the<br>
>> main point is, that you have all your discourse in on app, easily<br>
>> accessible and notification pop up only there if you want (as I want)<br>
>> <br>
>> Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 09:34, Simon Frei <<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com" target="_blank">freisim93@gmail.com</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com" target="_blank">freisim93@gmail.com</a>>> a écrit :<br>
>> <br>
>> According to reviews this app is just a webview of discourse. Which<br>
>> isn't bad, but you can just as well open it in your favorite mobile<br>
>> browser (which works pretty well, apart from the terrible<br>
>> typing, which<br>
>> is unrelated :) ).<br>
>> <br>
>> On 23/01/2019 09:27, Stefan Müller wrote:<br>
>> > it looks like <a href="http://pixel.us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">pixel.us</a> <<a href="http://pixel.us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pixel.us</a>> runs a<br>
>> <a href="https://www.discourse.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.discourse.org/</a> instance,<br>
>> > that's great :), the only thing what is missing is the mobile<br>
>> API to<br>
>> > access it with<br>
>> > <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse</a>.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote:<br>
>> >> On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote:<br>
>> >>>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the<br>
>> criticism.<br>
>> >>>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to<br>
>> non-members, if not<br>
>> >>>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2<br>
>> invitations from<br>
>> >>>> you,<br>
>> >>>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is<br>
>> interesting,<br>
>> >>>> to an<br>
>> >>>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times<br>
>> provided. LinkedIn<br>
>> >>>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no<br>
>> serious social<br>
>> >>>> networks in this world.<br>
>> >>> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my<br>
>> "proposed<br>
>> >>> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for<br>
>> personnal and<br>
>> >>> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to<br>
>> make the link<br>
>> >>> was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse"<br>
>> because, yes, I<br>
>> >>> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading<br>
>> mail, but I read<br>
>> >>> or heard something about this. I though it was on this list<br>
>> but after<br>
>> >>> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney<br>
>> service. They<br>
>> >>> don't<br>
>> >>> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could<br>
>> create very<br>
>> >>> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an<br>
>> invitation to<br>
>> >>> join<br>
>> >>> this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had<br>
>> much<br>
>> >>> work to<br>
>> >>> calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The<br>
>> only way to<br>
>> >>> make the link between both of them was to read mails where<br>
>> opposite<br>
>> >>> side's adress was written in the attorney box.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts<br>
>> that<br>
>> >>> probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site<br>
>> with a<br>
>> >>> professional layer were in fact just like the other ones<br>
>> and I don't<br>
>> >>> understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially<br>
>> because I<br>
>> >>> don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in<br>
>> france(but I<br>
>> >>> may<br>
>> >>> be wrong).<br>
>> >> LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the<br>
>> >> address book of<br>
>> >> members.<br>
>> >> To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on<br>
>> LinkedIn.<br>
>> >> They seem<br>
>> >> to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn,<br>
>> >> supposedly from<br>
>> >> members/through members. Although that practice seems to<br>
>> have calmed<br>
>> >> down<br>
>> >> lately.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> So, please do not replace this list by anything like<br>
>> LinkedIn, until<br>
>> >> such<br>
>> >> methods are abolished.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Remco<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> <br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><a href="https://patdavid.net">https://patdavid.net</a><br>GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC</div></div>