<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>I am wondering if straight ffmpeg / ffplay can be utilized instead of qtav. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> </div><div>Date: 2019-01-05 10:11 AM (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] MP4 video orientation dk6b3 </div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 18:01, Maik Qualmann <<a href="mailto:metzpinguin@gmail.com">metzpinguin@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">With my developer version everything is fine, thumbnail is in portrait mode <br>
and will play like that. With the AppImage the video is played incorrectly - <br>
strange. The correct video orientation (90) is found in the AppImage. I <br>
suspect a problem with the used QtAV version. Gilles, is QtAV from git / <br>
master?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>More and less. It's git/master but not updated since a while. This can be the problem...</div><div><br></div><div>And in fact QtAv have not been released since more than one year. The devel continue as i can see the commit in github, but stabilisation of code take age.</div><div>I open a file in github to ask a release plan : no response...</div><div><br></div><div>Also, take a care : ffmpeg in AppImage still the last 3.x stable release, not 4.x.</div><div> </div><div>Gilles</div></div></div>
</body></html>