<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hallo Christof,</p>
<p>you are not the only one hoping for such a feature, see <a
href="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digiKam-users-Multi-user-digiKam-setup-td4707375.html">[digiKam-users]
Multi-user digiKam setup?</a></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31.12.2018 09:32, Christof Elmiger
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:19795601-0f26-a40c-ea79-0b07fe7b1c6f@fornat.ch">Dear
List
<br>
<br>
I am aware that Digikam is not (yet) fully supporting
multi-user-environments. But in bug #322946 the last comment by
user T.D. from 2017 seems quite positive.
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322946">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322946</a>)
<br>
<br>
Encouraged by his positive comment I'd like to try setting up
digikam for using it in our small company (9 users, rarely
accessing photos at the same time, and if so, very rarely the same
photos).
<br>
<br>
Now I am wondering
<br>
<br>
1. if others have tried such a setup with multiple users since
2017 and the overall-experience is similarly positive as described
by T.D. in bug #322946
<br>
<br>
2. if it is advisable to create a separate Database-user-account
for each user, or if that doesn't matter at all (photo-collection
and corresponding Maria-DB are on a synology network-share).
<br>
<br>
Best regards
<br>
chris
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>