<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Thanks Maik</div><div><br></div><div>I will add that comment to the handbook if you don't mind.</div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> </div><div>Date: 2018-06-06 3:13 PM (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: digikam-users@kde.org </div><div>Cc: Andrey Goreev <aegoreev@gmail.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] digikam 6.0.0-git reading metadata from MP4 issues </div><div><br></div></div>Yes, if the option is activated, only the sidecar will read.<br><br>Maik<br><br>Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2018, 22:58:39 CEST schrieb Andrey Goreev:<br>> So they are higher priority than embedded metadata?<br>> <br>> Best regards,<br>> <br>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > > [x] read form sidecars<br>> > <br>> > Yes that's it, if a sidecar is present, this one will be used.<br>> > <br>> > Maik<br>> > <br>> > Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2018, 22:51:31 CEST schrieb Andrey Goreev:<br>> > > [x] read form sidecars<br>> > > [x] write to sidecars<br>> > > <br>> > > write to XMP sidecar for read-only item only<br>> > > <br>> > > Best regards,<br>> > > <br>> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com><br>> > <br>> > wrote:<br>> > > > Which sidecar settings did you set exactly?<br>> > > > <br>> > > > Maik<br>> > > > <br>> > > > Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2018, 22:36:30 CEST schrieb Andrey Goreev:<br>> > > > > Yes, XMP sidecar was there. I removed it and digikam read metadata<br>> > > > <br>> > > > properly<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > after that.<br>> > > > > Is that expected behavior ?<br>> > > > > <br>> > > > > Best regards,<br>> > > > > <br>> > > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Andrey Goreev <aegoreev@gmail.com><br>> > > > <br>> > > > wrote:<br>> > > > > > I haven't checked if XMP sidecar was actually created but yes it<br>> > > > <br>> > > > should be<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > > there.<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > -------- Original message --------<br>> > > > > > From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com><br>> > > > > > Date: 2018-06-06 8:56 AM (GMT-07:00)<br>> > > > > > To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with<br>> > <br>> > the<br>> > <br>> > > > > > power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org><br>> > > > > > Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] digikam 6.0.0-git reading metadata<br>> > <br>> > from<br>> > <br>> > > > MP4<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > > issues<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > Hi,<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > In 5.9.0, i suppose that XMP side car are generated to tag video,<br>> > <br>> > and<br>> > <br>> > > > this<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > > will include the date inside. Right ?<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > Best<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > Gilles Caulier<br>> > > > > > <br>> > > > > > 2018-06-06 16:07 GMT+02:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev@gmail.com>:<br>> > > > > >> Hello,<br>> > > > > >> <br>> > > > > >> I can't make the yesterday's appimage read metadata from this<br>> > <br>> > file:<br>> > > > > >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tRqd0hspDm74naVv1Emc_<br>> > <br>> > ZS7SaoObptP<br>> > <br>> > > > > >> However, this file being read just fine (GPS location,<br>> > > > > >> dimensions,<br>> > > > <br>> > > > etc.<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > >> show up):<br>> > > > > >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=18gnuIuTkh39Kcoxrat2j5vd3SLj83<br>> > <br>> > c3k<br>> > <br>> > > > > >> Both videos taken by the same camera and compressed by the same<br>> > > > > >> ffmpeg<br>> > > > > >> script.<br>> > > > > >> <br>> > > > > >> The only difference between them is that the first one I tagged,<br>> > > > <br>> > > > rated,<br>> > > > <br>> > > > > >> etc. in digikam 5.9.0. first and then opened in 6.0.0 and re-read<br>> > > > > >> metadata<br>> > > > > >> from file. The second one I did not do anything in 5.9.0 and<br>> > <br>> > opened<br>> > <br>> > > > > >> in<br>> > > > > >> 6.0.0 right away.<br>> > > > > >> <br>> > > > > >> Do you know what might cause that issue?<br>> > > > > >> <br>> > > > > >> Best regards,<br>> > > > > >> Andrey<br><br><br><br><br></body></html>