<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Hello Gilles</div><div><br></div><div>Here is the compilation guide:</div><div><br></div><div>https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/CompilationGuide/Centos</div><div><br></div><div>I have used it on openSUSE and have compiled ffmpeg without an issue.</div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> </div><div>Date: 2018-04-02 1:08 AM (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] The future of 6.0.0 bundles and C++11 support... </div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all, </div><div><br></div>Yesterday evening, i tried to build 6.0.0 AppImage under CentoS 6.9 in 64 bits. I forget another piece which increase the compilation complexity : ffmpeg.<div><br></div><div>digiKam require ffmpeg 3.x. Centos has no ffmpeg rpm officially, excepted one contrib repo in Romania with a 2.x release outdated.</div><div><br></div><div>We have already a file in bugzilla to build digiKam +qtAv with a recent ffmpeg, in goal to be able to manage recent video containers as H265. So i must add rules to compile ffmpeg myself in the bundle, and it's a complex task. I cannot use static ffmpeg build here, as i need shared libs.</div><div><br></div><div>So, no way to build 32 bits AppImage bundles for the future...</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-04-02 8:30 GMT+02:00 <a href="mailto:jdd@dodin.org">jdd@dodin.org</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jdd@dodin.org" target="_blank">jdd@dodin.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Le 02/04/2018 à 08:23, Remco Viëtor a écrit :<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
And as Gilles remarked, you can always switch to compiling Digikam yourself.<br>
Though that can get progressively more difficult if the distributions start<br>
phasing out otherwise unused libraries Digikam needs.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
chance are any 32 bits distro will have digikam. Only the appimage may be more difficult to find, but brand new functions often ask more of the hardware so needs more recent computer<br>
<br>
on openSUSE, Tumbleweed is still proposed with 32 bits (although this may not be for anybody)<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
jdd<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href="http://dodin.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://dodin.org</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</body></html>