<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Maybe not remove, but rewrite the recommendation.</p>
<p>If your camera can create picture files in DNG format, it's a
different story than using the different manufacturers raw format
(pef, nef, orf ...). <br>
</p>
And if you do not archive in some raw format (DNG being one), what
are you going to do ? Not in jpeg , which is lossy ; tiff ? but that
would be extra work for conversion.<br>
<br>
Jean-Max<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-01-11 14:50, Andrey Goreev
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOt0OUrGm+rOm2XeNXEH+YgCR5th_0YEuCTmJ0p9H5iBUWsChw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I totally agree with this:<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://discuss.pixls.us/t/ive-avoided-tagging-my-images-for-too-long/5837/5?u=andrius"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://discuss.pixls.us/t/ive-avoided-tagging-my-images-for-too-long/5837/5?u=andrius</a><br>
<br>
</div>
Should we remove that recommendation from the handbook? <br>
</div>
Looking for opinions<br>
<div>
<div><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Cheers<br>
</div>
<div>Andrey<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>