<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>
<div>It appears to me that putting the collection path into the rc file would solve the location issue between Linux and windows. Assuming that it is practiable to put the path into the rc file, would associating the collection with the UUID also in the rc file solve the Framework issue? Would it then be possible to use the same UUID for a collection between the 2 operating systems?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757"><br></div></div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Andrew Goodbody <ajg02@elfringham.co.uk> <br>Date: 02/11/2017 00:03 (GMT+01:00) <br>To: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com>, digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org> <br>Subject: Re: MariaDB 5 and 10 on Synology NAS <br><br>On 01/11/17 18:03, Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>> The Collection path is problematic as Linux and Windows are different on <br>> this point. This is also a problem to solve (partially solved if UUID is <br>> the same for both system).<br><br>And it is this point that means the collection path would be better <br>placed in the rc file instead of the database. The collection path is <br>specific to the local machine and as such should be in the rc file. This <br>would make sharing the database across machines much simpler.<br><br>Andrew<br></body></html>