<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Well that's a clear statement - no need for change, even than if
I would run only Linux PC's</p>
<p>Thanks Gilles! </p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 01.11.2017 um 19:03 schrieb Gilles
Caulier:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHFG6sFHqHEHp3rgNXxUs=S2HdmewrK7GFypCPkbGX62NbnQEw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-11-01 18:18 GMT+01:00 digiman <span
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rainer.barth@freenet.de"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rainer.barth@freenet.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
some time ago I tried mariadb on my synology NAS. It was
damn slow and I got<br>
always error messages because I used it from Windows and
Linux - finally I<br>
switched back to SQlite.<br>
So now I have two questions because I have now mariadb V10
additionally to<br>
version 5 on the NAS available:<br>
1.) Is Version 10 much faster so it is worth to give it a
try and<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I use this kind of server on my host computer. It's
enough fast to use but i don't pass through the local
network (only the localhost).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My NAS has an older Mariadb (old Debian for ARM). It's
incredibly slow. So it's same problem than you.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
2.) is the problem with Windows and Linux working on the
same DB solved so<br>
far?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No. The way to identify a collection in database is
based on UUID generated by KDE::Solid interface used
everywhere in digiKam. under Linux you get right UUID,
under Windows nothing, or not the same. Solid work
perfectly under Linux. For MacOS, a huge patch is under
validation into KDE bugzilla, but it's not yet officially
committed. For Windows, Solid is full of holes in source
code. This is the problem of KF5 framework where
developers are not interested to support non Linux system.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A replacement of Solid do not exists yet, as in future
Qt version. I follow the discussion, and digiKam is not
alone in this case. Solid is a gateway to the computer
device, and is well designed. So Solid need to be fully
ported well for Windows, or, we need to use native Windows
code inside digiKam, that is don't like very well.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The Collection path is problematic as Linux and Windows
are different on this point. This is also a problem to
solve (partially solved if UUID is the same for both
system).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gilles Caulier</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Many thanks in advanced<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Sent from: <a
href="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://digikam.1695700.n4.<wbr>nabble.com/digikam-users-<wbr>f1735189.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>