<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Sometimes I delete DNG but keep JPG so I am not sure if the permanent link between RAW and JPG would work for me...</div><div>I am not an expert but I think the database might become pretty complex too.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: cerp <cerp@eeos.biz> </div><div>Date: 2017-01-13 10:10 AM (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: Simon Frei <freisim93@gmail.com> </div><div>Cc: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: Problem with deleting and labelling JPG and RAW </div><div><br></div></div>I meant that in my opinion, the current solution, where you have to <br>select and group manually is convoluted.<br><br>The solution you propose is better (automatic grouping), but in my <br>opinion it would be better if JPG and RAW where linked automatically <br>without using the grouping feature, so that we would still be able to <br>use grouping for other issues.<br><br>Best,<br><br><br>Quoting Simon Frei <freisim93@gmail.com>:<br><br>> What is convoluted?<br>> If it is having to group them manually, that could be solved by an<br>> option on import to group by name. That would be a very useful feature<br>> indeed. There is already a more broad feature request about grouping on<br>> import: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121310<br>><br>> On 13/01/17 17:23, cerp wrote:<br>>> It does work, but it seems a bit convoluted .... it is quite standard<br>>> behaviour that is used for DAM, I believe.<br>>><br>>> Best,<br>>><br>>><br>>> Quoting Andrey Goreev <aegoreev@gmail.com>:<br>>><br>>>> Hello Cerp<br>>>> Please take a look here:<br>>>> https://discuss.pixls.us/t/culling-process-in-digikam/3000/5<br>>>> Hopefully it works.<br>>>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.<br>>>> -------- Original message --------From: cerp <cerp@eeos.biz> Date:<br>>>> 2017-01-13 8:56 AM (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your<br>>>> photographs as a professional with the power of open source<br>>>> <digikam-users@kde.org> Subject: Problem with deleting and labelling<br>>>> JPG and RAW<br>>>> Dear all,<br>>>><br>>>> We use digikam to manage our photographic assets.<br>>>><br>>>> One issue we have is that when we are on an assignment we normally<br>>>> shoot RAW + JPG, like most photographers.<br>>>><br>>>> When we go back, we then download photographs from the camera in a<br>>>> buffer disk, we first look quickly at the JPG to decide quickly which<br>>>> one to keep and which ones to throw away, then we take the one we keep<br>>>> and we categorise them (with labels) work on the RAW to obtain exactly<br>>>> the cuts and feel we need, then we move everything to archive.<br>>>><br>>>> One of the two big problems we have is that when we scan the JPG to<br>>>> decide what to keep and what to throw away, deleting the JPG does not<br>>>> delete the RAW, and marking the JPG does not automatically mark the<br>>>> RAW, so you haev to carry out every operation twice, which requires<br>>>> twice as much time. That is a huge problem.<br>>>><br>>>> How do we solve it?<br>>>><br>>>> PS: Separate email for the other problem.<br>>>><br>>>> Best Regards<br>>>> Corrado & Rina<br>>><br>>><br>>><br><br><br><br></body></html>