<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Hello Cerp </div><div><br></div><div>Please take a look here:</div><div><br></div><div>https://discuss.pixls.us/t/culling-process-in-digikam/3000/5</div><div><br></div><div>Hopefully it works.</div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: cerp <cerp@eeos.biz> </div><div>Date: 2017-01-13 8:56 AM (GMT-07:00) </div><div>To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org> </div><div>Subject: Problem with deleting and labelling JPG and RAW </div><div><br></div></div>Dear all,<br><br>We use digikam to manage our photographic assets.<br><br>One issue we have is that when we are on an assignment we normally <br>shoot RAW + JPG, like most photographers.<br><br>When we go back, we then download photographs from the camera in a <br>buffer disk, we first look quickly at the JPG to decide quickly which <br>one to keep and which ones to throw away, then we take the one we keep <br>and we categorise them (with labels) work on the RAW to obtain exactly <br>the cuts and feel we need, then we move everything to archive.<br><br>One of the two big problems we have is that when we scan the JPG to <br>decide what to keep and what to throw away, deleting the JPG does not <br>delete the RAW, and marking the JPG does not automatically mark the <br>RAW, so you haev to carry out every operation twice, which requires <br>twice as much time. That is a huge problem.<br><br>How do we solve it?<br><br>PS: Separate email for the other problem.<br><br>Best Regards<br>Corrado & Rina<br><br><br><br><br><br></body></html>