<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>new update:</p>
<p>I used the option "detect face" only (previously was using
(detect and recognize), and it is working better, close to 288 new
faces identified, but digikam fialed.</p>
<p>I try to open it again, and as soon as I click on "unknown" in
the list of people tags , it failed:</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>digikam.geoiface: ----<br>
digikam.geoiface: ----<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs<br>
digikam.database: " ( ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR
ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?))
AND ImageTagProperties.property=? ) OR (
(ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT
id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?
) ) "<br>
digikam.database: Search query:<br>
"SELECT DISTINCT Images.id, Images.name, Images.album,
Albums.albumRoot, ImageInformation.rating,
Images.category, ImageInformation.format,
ImageInformation.creationDate, Images.modificationDate,
Images.fileSize, ImageInformation.width,
ImageInformation.height, ImageTagProperties.value,
ImageTagProperties.property, ImageTagProperties.tagid FROM
Images INNER JOIN ImageTagProperties ON
ImageTagProperties.imageid=Images.id LEFT JOIN
ImageInformation ON Images.id=ImageInformation.imageid
INNER JOIN Albums ON Albums.id=Images.album WHERE
Images.status=1 AND ( ( ( (ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR
ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?))
AND ImageTagProperties.property=? ) OR (
(ImageTagProperties.tagid=? OR ImageTagProperties.tagid IN (SELECT
id FROM TagsTree WHERE pid=?)) AND ImageTagProperties.property=?
) ) );" <br>
(QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(QString,
"autodetectedFace"), QVariant(int, 25), QVariant(int, 25),
QVariant(QString, "tagRegion"))<br>
digikam.database: Search result: 4320<br>
digikam.general: Cancel Main Thread<br>
digikam.general: One job is done<br>
digikam.geoiface: ----<br>
digikam.metaengine: Exiv2 ( 2 ) : Directory Pentax, entry 0x0004:
Data area exceeds data buffer, ignoring it.<br>
<br>
/tmp/.mount_eSLYuC/AppRun : ligne 37 : 11389 Erreur de
segmentation digikam.wrapper $@<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>any idea ?</p>
<p>I'm running DK 5.4.0 on Linux Mint 18<br>
</p>
<p>(
<meta name="qrichtext" content="1">
</p>
<p>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wra</style>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><!--StartFragment-->Date
de compilation : Dec 3 2016 (cible : debug)<br>
Rév. : <a
href="http://commits.kde.org/digikam/e827054ebf4ff3ea7a4adaadcb36f989f48cc50e"><span
style=" text-decoration: underline; color:#508ed8;">e827054ebf4ff3ea7a4adaadcb36f989f48cc50e
)</span></a><!--EndFragment--></p>
</p>
<p>thanks for your help</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 24/12/2016 à 18:41, Frédéric Chaume
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:a779cac3-0937-04ac-f9f6-626ef06bd342@gmail.com"
type="cite">Hi all
<br>
<br>
made some test,
<br>
<br>
I selected all my albums and it took 18s :-(, and obvisouly no
face found
<br>
<br>
below an extract of the messages from the terminal, if it can help
someone
<br>
<br>
digikam.general: "Face Detection Dialog"
<br>
digikam.facesengine: Face database ready for use
<br>
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add preview thread
<br>
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add single thread detector
<br>
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add recognition worker
<br>
digikam.general: Face PipeLine: add database writer
<br>
digikam.general: Total is 682
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads
<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs
<br>
digikam.general: false true
<br>
digikam.general: One job is done
<br>
digikam.general: Check for finish: 0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads
<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs
<br>
digikam.general: false true
<br>
digikam.general: One job is done
<br>
digikam.general: Check for finish: 0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads
<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs
<br>
digikam.general: false true
<br>
digikam.general: One job is done
<br>
digikam.general: Check for finish: 0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads
<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs
<br>
digikam.general: false true
<br>
digikam.general: One job is done
<br>
digikam.general: Check for finish: 0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
<br>
.....
<br>
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Using 2 CPU core to run threads
<br>
digikam.general: Action Thread run 1 new jobs
<br>
digikam.general: false true
<br>
digikam.general: One job is done
<br>
digikam.general: Check for finish: 0 packages, 0 infos to filter,
hasFinished() true
<br>
digikam.general: false false
<br>
digikam.general: Event is dispatched to desktop notifier through
DBUS
<br>
<br>
<br>
Merry Christmas !!!!
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 11/12/2016 à 19:43, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I tried it just now again.
<br>
<br>
DigiKam starts searching. I do it with complete set of pictures
and for ~100.000 it will take some time ;-)
<br>
<br>
ok, here it is 5.3.0 AppImage
<br>
<br>
regards
<br>
Johannes
<br>
<br>
Am 11.12.2016 um 18:53 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Johannes
<br>
<br>
I tried with same value than you, analysis took 0s and didn't
report any
<br>
new faces
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
regards
<br>
<br>
<br>
frederic
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 11/12/2016 à 12:16, Johannes Kapune a écrit :
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Frédéric,
<br>
<br>
I saw same behaviour when I used face recognition.
<br>
<br>
If you play with: options / parameter
<br>
you will get some more hits but also some false face
detections.
<br>
<br>
(Actually I use a value of 35)
<br>
<br>
regards
<br>
Johannes
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 11.12.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Frédéric Chaume:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi All
<br>
<br>
<br>
I have the same behavior with last
5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage
<br>
<br>
in the option,I have just selected few albums    (not
all because of
<br>
time to proceed)
<br>
<br>
options I have used (translated from french, so my be not
exactly as in
<br>
windows in english)
<br>
<br>
- clean-up not confirmed results and analyze again
<br>
<br>
 - detect and recognize face
<br>
<br>
in advanced I have also selected "clean-up and rebuilt
learning data" to
<br>
force to analyze again
<br>
<br>
then execute. Process took 36 seconds , but nothing has
changed in the
<br>
faces. No new, no unknown,..
<br>
<br>
did I miss something ?
<br>
<br>
<br>
thanks
<br>
<br>
frederic
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 07/12/2016 à 04:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Typically no. Just backup your
database files before, to be sure.
<br>
<br>
Gilles Caulier
<br>
<br>
2016-12-06 22:59 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com">jmarxer@gmail.com</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com"><mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com></a>>:
<br>
<br>
Will I lose all the previously tagged faces (several
thousand) if
<br>
I use the 5.4.0 appimage?
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Gilles Caulier
<br>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com"><mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com></a><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:
<br>
<br>
Forget 4.4.0.
<br>
<br>
Try universal Linux AppImage bundle 5.4.0
pre-version instead
<br>
the system based package :
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM">https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM"><https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM></a>
<br>
<br>
Work perfectly here...
<br>
<br>
Gilles Caulier
<br>
<br>
2016-12-06 22:11 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer
<br>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com"><mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com></a><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jmarxer@gmail.com">jmarxer@gmail.com</a>>:
<br>
<br>
Hello,
<br>
I'm using DigiKam 4.4.0 under Debian Jessie
and when I try
<br>
to scan either some selected albums or the
whole
<br>
collection, I immediately get the following
message:
<br>
<br>
Process is done. Duration: 00:00:00
<br>
<br>
<br>
Any idea what is going wrong?
<br>
<br>
<br>
Jack Marxer
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>