<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div style="font-size:10pt">
<div>
<div>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">I've been tempted to downgrade because 4.2 still doesn't work right on fedora. I've submitted bugs since 4.1 but I think they believe 4.2 fixed the problem. The trouble I still have is in editing mode, not being able
to see the image at the correct size after resizing. Seems the resized image is always scaled to the original size, which makes things like sharpening impossible. Changing the %view to anything doesn't work right...basically same bug that was first reported
with 4.0 that seems to be lingering forever but in this case it's probably fedora developers because they did something to get around having to update so many dependencies, especially opencv.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"> </p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">------ Original message------</p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"><b>From: </b>Remco Viëtor</p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"><b>Date: </b>Thu, Sep 4, 2014 1:28 AM</p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"><b>To: </b>digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source;</p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"><b>Subject:</b>Re: [Digikam-users] Easy downgrade?</p>
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">On Thursday 04 September 2014 00:37:53 <br>
digikamusers.postfach144@neverbox.com wrote:<br>
> Thank you for your quick reply, Gilles!<br>
> <br>
> The short answer: Many things got slower, and I'm experiencing<br>
> quite a lot of new bugs in old features that hold me from getting<br>
> things done. My quick temporary solution is to downgrade.<br>
> <br>
> I deliberately didn't give a reason, because I feared this short,<br>
> unfocussed version could be misinterpreted as a rant about digiKam, its<br>
> developers, and life in general. ;-) But it's just my lacking the time<br>
> right now to handle FLOSS bugs as they should be handled. I hope I'll<br>
> find the time to come back to the concrete points. Thank you so far for<br>
> a great piece of software.<br>
> <br>
> Holger<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> "Gilles Caulier - caulier.gilles@gmail.com"<br>
> <digikamusers.postfach144.3d1ea0e90c.caulier.gilles#gmail.com@ob.0sg.net><br>
> schrieb:<br>
> <br>
> > No. DB schema has not changed with 4.2.0. You can downgrade safety.<br>
> > <br>
> > Just by curiosity : why to downgrade ?<br>
> > <br>
Just remember to also downgrade the KIPI plugins, or you could get some <br>
surprises (I hit an undefined symbol in Geolocation with Digikam 3.5 and <br>
KIPI 4.2...)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
Digikam-users@kde.org<br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>