<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">It's
Windows, Carl, and the processor is a P.O.S. dual core that was
meant for a laptop, but it's in my desktop. My comment on speed
was relative to the Canon program, and even the Windows Phone
one. But it's fine, it is what it is, I'm just grateful for the
discovery.<br>
<br>
On the topic, and further internet research, that the use of
"Local Contrast" in dK might be a bit of a misnomer. As
mentioned, in PS, the plug-in does work with local contrast, not
overall tones. In fact, I'm seeing "Tone mapping" being used
for what dK calls "Local Contrast." Seems to be more accurate,
grammatically.<br>
<br>
Paul Verizzo <br>
<br>
</font></font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/17/2014 8:22 AM, Carl McGrath
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5377546D.6000802@comcast.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Paul<br>
I scanned quickly for what OS you are running but did not find it;
I run openSUSE 13.1<br>
dK 4.0.0 arrived a few days ago, with all the fixes Gilles
reported that enable multicore.<br>
<br>
Local Contrast and Sharpness tools now blazing fast(by comparison)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/17/2014 07:58 AM, Paul Verizzo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:53774EEE.1080005@paulv.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font size="+1"><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Wow,
that's it! <br>
<br>
I finally had time to locate some of the lousy original
photos I had successfully improved with a couple of other
programs, including, oddly, that Nokia (Windows Phone) Fix.
<br>
<br>
Putzed with dK Local Contrast, works beautifully. Just what
I was after. <br>
<br>
I tried to find information and help in the dK PDF, but
could not. Searching online, "local contrast" brings up a
lot of Photoslop entries, but they necessitate using layers
and unsharp mask. So much for the expensive program. If I
add "digikam" to the search, I just keep getting repeats
from a blog posting.<br>
<br>
I'd like to learn how to manually control adjustments for
best results.<br>
<br>
Any further help to be found?<br>
<br>
Oh, yes. Kind of slow, but if I factor in the need to open
another program, rename, shuffle files, Local Contrast is
another dK winner!<br>
<br>
Thanks, Giles (and all others!)<br>
<br>
Paul <br>
</font></font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/10/2014 12:11 PM, Gilles
Caulier wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHFG6sGwqdPUFHk0U47hyumdMKN8kGY7iL=TEnRczQzz1GSykA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">digiKam has LocalContrast tool which make the same correction to
image. In fact it emulate pseudo HDR rendering.
Gilles Caulier
2014-05-10 18:07 GMT+02:00 Paul Verizzo <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:paulv@paulv.net"><paulv@paulv.net></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Background: I've been in digital photography since 2000, decades of film
before and since. I'm certainly familiar with the use of curves to correct
bad photos. But so tedious, and if the photos are snapshots, hard to
justify the time. It appears to me, although I can't prove it, that digital
cameras, discrete or within phones, seem to be doing a much better job
automatically adjusting curves than my old Minolta A2, for instance.
I recently became aware of a new free Canon program, My Image Garden, that
has a much improved Auto-fix than its forerunner. As an example, a backlit
photo processed in MIG will bring up only the shadows while leaving the
normal and highlights alone. It allegedly uses a zone by zone analysis. It
is a terrible program in every other regard, clunky interface, bloated, etc.
But I used it for some recent pics to advantage.
Some of those pictures were originally on my Windows Phone 8, which I had
copied to the HD. Before I deleted them from the phone, I poked around with
the options at that point. I found an auto-fix, pushed the "button," and my
jaw dropped. Literally. A very dark, underexposed shot made perfect! This
feature is within the Nokia programs! It is so good, I can see myself
transferring photos from other sources into the phone for correction! And
it's fast, even so.
I went back through the digiKam manual and looked on screen, and I see the
old standbys there, but nothing like what I've experienced with the above.
Oh, upon lots of research, I found a 2007 $40 program called Photoright that
upon test, seems to be doing similar zone adjustments.
Bottom lines: Are my observations valid? Do you think DK might get
something like this? Oh, yes, all Windows although MIG is available for
Mac.
Thanks, Paul Verizzo
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>