<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/6/14 Gilles Caulier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">2012/6/14 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mnaugendre@gmail.com" target="_blank">mnaugendre@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This might have happened in the past, but I don't remember what was the proposed solution: I have a couple of RAW pictures that are not recognized as such when filtered;</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>This CR2 files are versioned/grouped ?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>No. I still haven't begun to use this feature; is it reliable in 2.5? (I had big problems with 'lost' pictures in previous versions)</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> the image properties (dimensions and such) are displayed as 'unknown' in the right panel.<br>
How can I make them recognize again by Digikam?<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>In Caption & Tags from right sidebar, on the bottom, you can update DB by a scan of file metadata. This fix the problem ?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Yes, thanks. It worked fine for all those pictures. I hadn't realized there was this button (more or less hidden...)<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><div>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>Thanks for your answer,<br>Marie-Noëlle<br><br>PS: by the way, I just installed 2-6-0.beta-3, but it was the same with 2.5<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Definitively, do not test with beta3 since final release 2.6.0 is out and a lots of bugs have been fixed.</div></div></blockquote><div><br>Will it be release quite soon? Or do you advise I go back to 2.5?<br>
<br>Thanks for helping,<br>Marie-Noëlle<br><br><br></div></div>-- <br><a href="http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/" target="_blank"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-3CngBD0rusY/T2ehQSWI1gI/AAAAAAAABto/JgLg9iDzPHQ/s800/Banni%25C3%25A8re.jpg"></a><br>
<br>Mes dernières photos sont <a href="http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/" target="_blank">dans ma galerie</a>.<br>Retrouvez-moi aussi <a href="http://www.mnaugendre.com/" target="_blank">sur mon blog</a>.<br>Et parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon avec <a href="http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com/" target="_blank">Cévennes Plurielles</a>, <br>
<br>