<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>>Remco said : </span>(well, I can imagine one case: you have to send the image to a device through </div>>software that cannot apply a needed output profile).<div><br></div><div>That's for this unique usage i want to convert my pictures : send it to a remote lab. And not at all for storage or archiving. </div><div><br></div><div>I'm going to send links of labs in a following mail</div><div><br></div><div>PLX<br><div><br></div><div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "><div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "><font size="2" face="Arial"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">De :</span></b> Remco Viëtor <remco.vietor@wanadoo.fr><br><b><span style="font-weight:
bold;">À :</span></b> digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users@kde.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Envoyé le :</span></b> Vendredi 7 Octobre 2011 19h24<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Objet :</span></b> Re: [Digikam-users] Choose another ICC profile for converting pictures<br></font><br>On Friday 07 October 2011 18:00:01 Marcel Wiesweg wrote:<br>> > If it's easy to enable soft-proofing in Digikam with any ICC profile you<br>> > want (for instance photoweb-V4.icc), in the color space convertion tool,<br>> > you only can choose the default kdcraw profiles (ie sRGB, Adobe RGB,<br>> > Wide<br>> > Gamut and Kodak Prophoto RGB) and the screen profiles installed on the<br>> > system, but not another profile like photoweb-V4.icc (even if its placed<br>> > in the same folder than the others profiles).<br>> <br>> It's a
matter of a single line of code to add output profiles to the combo<br>> box as well. Question to the expertise assembled in this list: Should we do<br>> it?<br><br>I already see my (homemade) screen profiles in the list (having entered the <br>directory where they are stored in the corresponding configuration). So if <br>one, why not the other?<br><br>That said, I'm not at all convinced that applying an output profile to an <br>image ment for storage/archiving/distribution is a good idea in any case. <br>(well, I can imagine one case: you have to send the image to a device through <br>software that cannot apply a needed output profile).<br>_______________________________________________<br>Digikam-users mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users"
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br><br><br></div></div></div></div></body></html>