I'm not sure I that was clear.<br><br>I'm aware of that my choice to use code from git (the place where developers submit and exchange code while developing) for my "beta3" packages have made things a bit confusing when it comes to what is what. As the developers had changed in the code to beta4 (only in the about dialogue window in digikam) in git a few days after the beta3 code was released as a official tarball release then the code in my packages got the beta4 name but was beta4 code in early development. The packages worked as they should but I think it might have made bug tracking more difficult and confusing for both users and developers. I won't release any more packages using code from git to stay away from this kind of confusion and only package official tarball releases, even though my debian changelog and the package naming pointed out that the code came from git and when. <br>
<br>And to complicate the issue a bit more there was a rebuild of my packages of beta3 git code against updated KDE 4.6.1 so it was linked against the new libmarble .11 and not the older libmarble .10 that KDE 4.6.0 used.<br>
<br>Hope this clear things out when it comes to naming.<br><br>/Philip<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Johnsson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philip.johnsson@gmail.com">philip.johnsson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">No. It's just that the "beta3" packages was code from git (which was misleading) a few days after the beta3 was released and therefore got the name "beta4" (changed in upstream git code) when you looked in the about digikam dialog in Digikam. The real full beta4 was release the other day both as code and a new package updates on my PPA.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>/Philip <br></font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, sleepless <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sleeplessregulus@hetnet.nl" target="_blank">sleeplessregulus@hetnet.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Are there different versions around with the same version number?<br>
<br>
I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him that
I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded packages of the
release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already a couple of weeks
using this version. I am no programmer, totaly new to Linux and
digikam. I have no idea how I managed to have it on my computer.<br>
<br>
Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try Philip's
one?<br>
Rinus<br>
<br>
<br>
Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
<blockquote type="cite"><div><div></div><div>Just a note to all using my PPA. <br>
<br>
I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my
camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in
libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated digikam
2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before a digikam 2.0
beta4 bug report is the right place.<br>
<br>
Just so you know.<br>
<br>
/Philip<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles
Caulier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Thanks Philip...<br>
<br>
Gilles Caulier<br>
<br>
2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <<a href="mailto:philip.johnsson@gmail.com" target="_blank">philip.johnsson@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div>
<div>> I just uploaded packages of the release
of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)<br>
> on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be
available within the<br>
> hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before
you find digikam 2.0<br>
> packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10
(maverick) and<br>
> instructions on how to install them are to be find in
this thread.<br>
><br>
> Happy digikaming!<br>
><br>
> /Philip<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson<br>
> <<a href="mailto:philip.johnsson@gmail.com" target="_blank">philip.johnsson@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):<br>
>> <a href="http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/" target="_blank">http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/</a><br>
>><br>
>> /Philip<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx <<a href="mailto:photonoxx@free.fr" target="_blank">photonoxx@free.fr</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?<br>
>>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)<br>
>>><br>
>>> After that, if you install Digikam package,
you will get the 1.9 version,<br>
>>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the
digikam2 package.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy <<a href="mailto:ozzyprv@gmail.com" target="_blank">ozzyprv@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit:<br>
>>><br>
>>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the
beta version?<br>
>>> > I normally would type:<br>
>>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam<br>
>>> > but I don't want to install that one
that is in the Ubuntu<br>
>>> > repositories.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > Thanks.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > O.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a
thing a stupid question.....<br>
>>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip
Johnsson<br>
>>> > <<a href="mailto:philip.johnsson@gmail.com" target="_blank">philip.johnsson@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then
yes.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> /Philip<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> --<br>
>>> Nicolas Boulesteix<br>
>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.photonoxx.fr" target="_blank">http://www.photonoxx.fr</a><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><p color="#000000" align="left">Geen virus
gevonden in dit bericht.<br>
Gecontroleerd door AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van
uitgifte: 03/29/11</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>