<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.30.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
First problem encountered...<BR>
<BR>
Following the instructions given at <TT><FONT COLOR="#3c3c3c">http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download/SvnAlongStable</FONT></TT> I've been able to get as far as "<B>Patch CMakeLists.txt to be able to build standalone. Download appended <A HREF="http://www.digikam.org/drupal/system/files/libkexiv2cmake.diff_.txt">patch</A> and place it in your development folder.</B>" I found the original CMakeLists.txt on my boat trunk/libkeeiv2/ and, I found the patch via the link:<BR>
<BR>
Index: CMakeLists.txt
<PRE>
===================================================================
--- CMakeLists.txt (Revision 1117624)
+++ CMakeLists.txt (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,5 +1,20 @@
PROJECT(libkexiv2)
+FIND_PACKAGE(KDE4 REQUIRED)
+INCLUDE(KDE4Defaults)
+INCLUDE(MacroLibrary)
+INCLUDE(MacroOptionalAddSubdirectory)
+INCLUDE(FindPackageHandleStandardArgs)
+
+ADD_DEFINITIONS (${QT_DEFINITIONS} ${QT_QTDBUS_DEFINITIONS} ${KDE4_DEFINITIONS})
+INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES (${QDBUS_INCLUDE_DIRS} ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} ${KDE4_INCLUDES})
+
+# Preview acess was added in Exiv2 0.18
+# IMPORTANT : Several fixes done in 0.19. Set as default version when KDE 4.4 will be released
+set(EXIV2_MIN_VERSION "0.18")
+macro_optional_find_package(Exiv2)
+macro_log_feature(EXIV2_FOUND "Exiv2" "A library to access image metadata" "http://www.exiv2.org" FALSE ${EXIV2_MIN_VERSION} "Required to build libkexiv2 and gwenview.")
+
# =======================================================
# Information to update before to release this library.
</PRE>
<BR>
I assume that I copy the above and paste it into CMakeLists.txt. Is this correct? Where do I append it? At the beginning? At the end?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 19:58 +0100, Michael G. Hansen wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On 12/19/2010 07:50 PM, Hevï Guy wrote:
> Thank-you Michael. A few more Noob questions:
>
> If I am somehow successful in getting DigiKam running by following what
> seems to be a complete set of instructions in your link, how would I
> then delete the stable version?
You would have to uninstall it using the package management tools of
your distribution - for ubuntu, 'sudo apt-get remove digikam'. However,
you should first remove it, otherwise your installation overwrites the
files which apt-get thinks are in the package, and then they may be
removed when you uninstall.
> Will it be safe to delete the development folder and contents after a
> successful build (I assume that the build also makes all the appropriate
> directories and populates the files accordingly, right?).
Once you ran 'make install', yes, you can remove the build folder.
Michael
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>