Thanks Adam,<br><br>Do you use Canon Raw? I'm curious of what strategy I should use for these images. If tagging these raw images don't write to metadata but only the database (currently the issue on my computer at least), then are you or whomever that is doing this with Canon raw just tagging and relying on the database - thus hoping that the issue is someday fixed? Or don't care? In a perfect world for me, I could tag my raw images, then when one moves me to edit it and save as tiff or jpeg to share on something like flickr - which I do now - that the keywords/tags would move along the stream and show up as tags on flickr or other photosharing site. But mainly it seems if the tags were written to metadata keywords then they would be transportable to other programs far into the future without worrying too much about losing the tags/keywords.<br>
<br>cheers, Jim<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Adam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:photos@papettys.com">photos@papettys.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div>I think, it is a problem with Canon Raw, or at least I know it does not
work with Canon. It is the plugin that Digikam used to write the metat
data, not really a digikam issue. <br><br>I setup a backup that runs
every 4 hours just copies the database to other folders. I almost lost
all mine when I did an upgrade recently, but the backups saved me. Good
luck</div><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Jim Dory <<a href="mailto:james@dorydesign.com" target="_blank">james@dorydesign.com</a>><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <<a href="mailto:digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">digikam-users@kde.org</a>><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Sun, February 21, 2010 4:18:11 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Digikam-users] lost all tags on canon raw images<br></font><div><div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>
Thanks for your help!<br><br>It seems that on my computer at least, raw metadata in Digikam is broken. I will avoid tagging until I get that figured out - I'll see if I can work it out in another program for tags/keywords in the meantime.<br>
<br>Does raw tags/keywords work for others in Digikam? Can people use the Image/Metadata/Edit IPTC for instance? On mine, I cannot navigate or click on anything in that window on a raw image whereas jpegs are fine.<br><br>
cheers, Jim<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Vlado Plaga <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:rechner@vlado-do.de" target="_blank">rechner@vlado-do.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Am Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:13:42 -0900<br>
schrieb Jim Dory <<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:james@dorydesign.com" target="_blank">james@dorydesign.com</a>>:<br>
<div><br>
> However, back when I was keeping the database on the<br>
> NFS shares there were many times I had to delete it and let it rebuild so I<br>
> could again view the images. The jpeg tags were always back - I just don't<br>
> know if my raw image tags were also there or perhaps I hadn't tagged them<br>
> yet. So I guess I had a false sense of security - thinking the tags were<br>
> somewhere in the image rather than database.<br>
<br>
</div>Maybe you want to vote for "digiKam could warn when writing metadata to<br>
pictures fails"?<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220204" target="_blank">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220204</a><br>
<br>
I think it is a significant problem if you chose "write metadata to<br>
pictures", but for some reason digiKam can only store the information<br>
in its database.<br>
<br>
I'm sorry for you if you lost a lot of tags.<br>
<div><br>
> I run Gentoo's cutting edge (their unstable branch) so am probably asking<br>
> for trouble.<br>
<br>
</div>In any case I recommend making backups from time to time. I use rsync<br>
with snapshots, but not with cron (yet). Similar to this solution:<br><span>
<a href="http://www.rsnapshot.org/" target="_blank">http://www.rsnapshot.org/</a></span><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Vlado<br>
</font><div><div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>