<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Stupid newbie question here, but can the newest beta be compiled in Ubuntu? can someone tell me how, off list of course<br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Andi Clemens <andi.clemens@gmx.net><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> digikam-users@kde.org<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thu, November 12, 2009 10:10:49 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Digikam-users] Problems moving photos from EOS 350D<br></font><br>
This has nothing to do with the detected camera, but with the SelectAlbum <br>dialg and was fixed in beta6.<br>Kubuntu unfortunately thinks it is cool to add beta-Software to their stable <br>releases (not only digiKam is suffering from that right now). This sheds a <br>false light over digiKam and leads to a huge number of duplicate bugreports.<br>They should have left digikam-beta in some experimental branch and keep <br>digiKam-0.10 as the official release, as many other distributions do.<br><br>Some rant about this can be found here:<br><span><a target="_blank" href="http://apaku.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/dont-install-ubuntu-9-10-if-you-want-a">http://apaku.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/dont-install-ubuntu-9-10-if-you-want-a</a>-</span><br>stable-kdevelop/<br><br>I really hope Ubuntu will update digiKam, otherwise we receive these reports <br>for 6 months now :-(<br><br>Andi<br><br>On Thursday 12 November 2009 15:48:03 Anders Troberg wrote:<br>> With
the version currently in Kubuntu, I had some weird problems when<br>> trying to download photos from my EOS 350D. Digikam detected it as a<br>> Canon Rebel XT, which, given that it's the US designation for the<br>> camera, I thought was close enough. However, as soon as the transfer<br>> started, DigiKam crashed. This was a consistently repeatable error.<br>> <br>> After fooling around a bit, I tried manually adding the EOS 350D camera<br>> to the list. Iirc, it still identified it as a Rebel XT, but now it<br>> worked perfectly.<br>> <br>> Probably some minor hickup, so just consider this a bug report and some<br>> bug hunting information.<br>> <br>> /Anders Troberg<br>> <a ymailto="mailto:anders.troberg@tekis.se" href="mailto:anders.troberg@tekis.se">anders.troberg@tekis.se</a><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>> <a
ymailto="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>> <br>_______________________________________________<br>Digikam-users mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org" href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br></div></div>
<!-- cg15.c1.mail.mud.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Wed Oct 28 10:34:49 PDT 2009 -->
</div></body></html>