<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Sans Serif'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">Hi,<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>I have also experimented with some profiles from Bibble. This software has profiles for a large nuber of brands and models. Some of them work quite well; in my case (Canon EOS 450D) the file <span style=" font-weight:600;">canonc.icm</span> is best suited with digiKam. (i wonder if this use of the profiles might create legal issues; if anyone have information, please let me know), However, all these are "blind" tests as the profiles don't have inside the brand/model camera information. You'll need to trust your eyes :-)<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>As a general rule, it seems that the only way to obtain profiles is from manufacturer's or third parties software, and these will be at best approximate. "The" profile could only be obtained by means of a spectrocolorimeter... :-( <br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Best for everyone<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Francisco<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p><p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>On Sábado, 20 de Junio de 2009, Francesco wrote:<br>
Hi,<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>,------[ Milan said :: ]<br>
| P.S. BTW, use of Canon's profiles may not be the best option<br>
| since these profiles were built for Canon's software, not<br>
| for digiKam's raw converter. However, if the output is<br>
| satisfactory, it is better than nothing.<br>
`------<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Any thoughts on how one might determine or obtain profiles<br>
that are more suited. I too have been using those supplied<br>
by canon and am always looking for ways to improve my setup.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Many thanks,<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p><p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>F<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
Digikam-users@kde.org<br>
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> Hi,<br>
><br>
> ,------[ Milan said :: ]<br>
><br>
> | P.S. BTW, use of Canon's profiles may not be the best option<br>
> | since these profiles were built for Canon's software, not<br>
> | for digiKam's raw converter. However, if the output is<br>
> | satisfactory, it is better than nothing.<br>
><br>
> `------<br>
><br>
> Any thoughts on how one might determine or obtain profiles<br>
> that are more suited. I too have been using those supplied<br>
> by canon and am always looking for ways to improve my setup.<br>
><br>
> Many thanks,<br>
><br>
><br>
> F<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
> Digikam-users@kde.org<br>
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</p></body></html>