<span class="gmail_quote">FerBatista,<br><br>Original Nikon and Canon icc camera profiles has problems... It do not repect/implemente completely the standard defined with ICC stuff... Look in mailing list archive for details... Paco can give you more informations than me, as he have a Nikon camera...
<br><br>I recommend to try the profiles witch come from LightZone. Its work very well with digiKam. Files are here :<br><br><a href="http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/ICCPROFILES/CameraProfiles/LZ.2.0/">http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/ICCPROFILES/CameraProfiles/LZ.2.0/
</a><br><br>Gilles Caulier<br></span><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/5/31, FerBatista <<a href="mailto:ferbatista@mail.telepac.pt">ferbatista@mail.telepac.pt</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I tried to compile digikam but it's a bit to much for my knowledge so far,<br>the first two steps (configure and make) went ok, but I got a few errors in<br>the next step. So I quit the job for now. Anyway I noticed that the monitor
<br>profile extension was written in capital letter so I corrected that and<br>guess what... it works ok for the monitor profile now.<br><br>The only ones I can't make work now are Nikon's profiles under input. Nikon
<br>CMYK works under proof, and Nikon adobe appears both on monitor and<br>workspace, but not on input. These are input profiles or at least they<br>should be, or am I wrong?<br><br>I can send the profiles but where do I send it to?
<br><br>Thanks<br><br><br><br><br>F.J.Cruz-2 wrote:<br>><br>> El Miércoles, 30 de Mayo de 2007, Gilles Caulier escribió:<br>>> 2007/5/30, FerBatista <<a href="mailto:ferbatista@mail.telepac.pt">ferbatista@mail.telepac.pt
</a>>:<br>>><br>>><br>>> Typically, there are 2 ways to install a program :<br>>><br>>> - one devel bin program with debug symbols : big and slow, but dedicaced<br>>> to<br>>> give report if it crash and provide informations on console. It generally
<br>>> the case when you compile yourself the program using a source tarball<br>>> (and<br>>> when you use the right options to compile it in this mode)<br>>> - one target bin program without debug symbols : less big, more fast and
<br>>> optimized. It generally provided by package like RPM or DEB.<br>>><br>>> Gilles<br>><br>> Could you send me some of those profiles?, I can try to do some tests with<br>> them.<br>><br>
><br>> Paco Cruz.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>><br>><br><br>--<br>View this message in context: <a href="http://www.nabble.com/Color-managent-question-problem-tf3838880.html#a10898465">http://www.nabble.com/Color-managent-question-problem-tf3838880.html#a10898465
</a><br>Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at <a href="http://Nabble.com">Nabble.com</a>.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Digikam-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">
Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>