General Performance Issues Viewing Large Pictures

Tonio Kroeger tonio.kroeger1903 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 16 20:53:26 GMT 2023


>The color management takes time to load, if you temporarily switch it off
with F12 (On/Off) (Menu-> View), images will load even faster. You can test
it to see if it works for you.

This really makes the difference! Cached versus non-cached is still
noticable but not worth mentioning. Great.

Thanks a lot

Tonio (digikam 8.2 now)


On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:36 PM Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com> wrote:

> The color management takes time to load, if you temporarily switch it off
> with
> F12 (On/Off) (Menu-> View), images will load even faster. You can test it
> to
> see if it works for you.
>
> Maik
>
> Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2023, 16:37:01 CEST schrieben Sie:
> > With digiKam-8.1.0-20230628T051819-x86-64.appimage I get Memory available
> > 62.4 GiB and Image cache size 1.0 GiB.
> >
> > Behavior is now exactly how you describe. Next image is shown very fast,
> > immediately clicking next again results in longer delay.
> >
> > For sorting my "family photos" I am absolutely happy with that behavior.
> > And actually this is my main task :-)
> >
> > When I curate my birding pictures more caching maybe would make sense.
> > Birding in my case means I have bursts of photos, often several hundret
> > very similar pictures. Typically I delete all but 1%. I do this by
> skipping
> > through the pictures in 100%-view.
> >
> > Best wishes and thanks for this great software!
> >
> > Tonio
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:41 PM Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Again to make sure our DMemoryInfo class is working correctly. Please
> see
> > > the
> > > digiKam component info dialog. How much memory is shown as available on
> > > your
> > > system?
> > >
> > > Maik
> > >
> > > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2023, 22:07:06 CEST schrieb Tonio Kroeger:
> > > > WAAAAAHHHHHHHH! :-) Yes 64GB. And now everything makes sense.
> Moreover I
> > > > had a try with: digiKam-8.1.0-20230617T074456-x86-64.appimage
> > > > The difference is tremendous. Thanks a lot!
> > > >
> > > > Tonio
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:42 PM Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com
> >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Is the specification of 64GB for the memory correct?
> > > > > With this size, we calculate the image cache incorrectly, only a
> very
> > > > > small
> > > > > cache is created, so no larger images are preloaded in the preview.
> > > > > The
> > > > > problem will be fixed in digiKam-8.1.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maik
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2023, 18:12:19 CEST schrieb Tonio Kroeger:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am an enthusiastic digikam user for nearly 20 years now!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am running 8.0.0. on an I7 under Linux with plenty of RAM (
> > >
> > >
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/205608/intel-nuc-11-p
> > >
> > > > > ro>
> > > > >
> > > > > > -mini-pc-nuc11tnkv7/specifications.html). My picture collection
> > >
> > > became
> > >
> > > > > huge,
> > > > >
> > > > > > about 8TB (also many RAW files, roughly 300.000 Jpegs), and I
> still
> > >
> > > use
> > >
> > > > > > SQLLite for the database.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In general everything works fine but when I switch to another
> > > > > > picture
> > > > >
> > > > > this
> > > > >
> > > > > > takes up to 3 seconds. This is very anyoing especially when
> sorting
> > >
> > > out
> > >
> > > > > > pictures. For the latter purpose I store incoming pictues on the
> > > > > > internal
> > > > > > SSD but this leads exactly to the 3 seconds from above, external
> > > > >
> > > > > USB-drive
> > > > >
> > > > > > is worse but not as worse as I would expect. I tried to precache
> all
> > > > > > pictures into RAM, that did not significantly help. When I lower
> the
> > > > > > maximal CPU frequency this seems to scale linearly with the time
> to
> > >
> > > show
> > >
> > > > > a
> > > > >
> > > > > > new picture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Over the years my pictures became larger and larger. Today I have
> > >
> > > Jpegs
> > >
> > > > > > around 20MB. (5MB Pics from my IPhone show up very fast.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wonder whether someone can give a hint where I might have an
> issue
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > my system. Is SQLLite a problem in my setting? Or are the 3
> seconds
> > >
> > > just
> > >
> > > > > my
> > > > >
> > > > > > fate because of the many megapixel...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best wishes & tnx
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tonio
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20231116/49b34c8a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list