[Digikam-users] Re: why is import/transport so much slower than transform anlone?

[Gilles Caulier]

no idea. i use png conversion all the time without any problem  sound
like a memory leak.

as i work hard currently on camera interface, i will check it. but
future improvements will be available for 2.1. there are a huge list
of cource code commits to push just after 2.0.

can you hear me which camera driver you use exactly ? which version of
all shared libs too ?

gilles caulier

2011/7/23, Daniel Bauer <linux at daniel-bauer.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I thoght I was a very bright boy, when I started to import 210 jpg's from a
> local folder into digikam album and at the same time transform them to png.
> But after 60 images I stopped - it took 40 minutes so far...
>
> I imported the remaining jpgs without transforming (took some seconds) and
> started a digikam batch job to transform the rest (153 images) to png. That
> took 12 minutes.
>
> Why is there such a big difference? Did I miss something in the settings?
> Don't the batch job and the imprt tool use the same program for the
> transform
> from jpg to png?
>
> Would be nice to do this transformation right with the import, would save
> some
> clicks, but of course only, if it worked about the same as the other...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> kind regards
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Barcelona
> professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com
> erotic nudes: http://www.guapamania.com
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>