<div dir="ltr">The time latency from gui are done certainly by sqlite lock because a lots lots data need to be managed in database.<div><br></div><div>Did you store the DB file in a fast device as a SSD. This improve also the performance until a limit of course.</div><div><br></div><div>In all case, as you use git/master code, Mysql must give better results. We will interested to have a comparison.</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-07-22 19:35 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">From my experience sqlite use must be limited to 100Gb of images. For more, use Mysql. You can use internal server, no need a remote server. In this case, it will be used as sqlite.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></font></span></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-07-22 19:31 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com" target="_blank">freisim93@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Compiled from software-compilation. Git core is on commit c9f02e0.<div><div><br>
<br>
<div>On 22/07/16 19:14, Gilles Caulier
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Which digiKam version do you use ?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gilles Caulier</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-07-22 17:32 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com" target="_blank">freisim93@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi<br>
I do not have enough detailed information to file a bug and
something similar might already be reported. Still I wanted
to inform you about it. Maybe it helps in some way.<br>
I just made changes to a big set of images (350G) outside of
digikam (metadata writing with exiftool). So it took quite
some time searching for new items after startup
(notification on the bottom left), but never used cpu or ram
very hard. After some time however digikam became
unresponsive, just a grey frame. The commandline did show
that it was still working in the background, the following
was displayed repeatedly:<br>
digikam.dimg: "*somefile*" : JPEG file identified<br>
digikam.metaengine: Orientation => Exif.Image.Orientation
=> 1<br>
So digikam was still functioning, just not the gui and still
digikam did load the computer, but not overload. After a
certain time digikam resurfaced and worked fine.<br>
Cheers,<br>
Simon<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-devel@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
<a href="mailto:Digikam-devel@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-devel@kde.org</a>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-devel@kde.org" target="_blank">Digikam-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>