<table><tr><td style="">danders added a comment.
</td></tr></table><br /><div><div><p>I think where leinir has landed is more doable than a frameworks.<br />
Also if compiletime is a big hurdle, I see a couple of things that can be done:</p>
<ul class="remarkup-list">
<li class="remarkup-list-item">Remove pigment, see <a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/T5738" style="background-color: #e7e7e7;
border-color: #e7e7e7;
border-radius: 3px;
padding: 0 4px;
font-weight: bold;
color: black;text-decoration: none;">T5738</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul class="remarkup-list">
<li class="remarkup-list-item">Make more finegrained productsets. Pt the only thing you can control (if I haven't missed anything) is which apps to build.</li>
</ul>
<p>E.g. if you want to work on the innards of words for gemini, you select gemini and get words, sheets and stage. In addition you get almost all plugins and all relevant filters. Probably *some* plugins are necessary but you should be able to do without most plugins and no filters at all.</p>
<p>Another problem is how new users find out how to use productsets. A front-end would have been nice, but a bit of documantation should go a long way.</p></div></div><br /><div><strong>TASK DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/T12815">https://phabricator.kde.org/T12815</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>danders<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>danders, davidllewellynjones, ndavis, jtamate, rempt, anthonyfieroni, dcaliste, boemann, pino, rjvbb, ngraham, ognarb, Calligra-Devel-list, Calligra: 3.0, leinir, cochise, vandenoever<br /></div>