Amarok 2, as in Amarok 2.0. Amarok2 sounds more like some sort of sequel/derivative, as opposed to a new major release.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/22/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Kretschmann</b> <
<a href="mailto:kretschmann@kde.org">kretschmann@kde.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Heya,<br><br>this might not be the most important issue ever, but I see myself
<br>constantly switching between these two notations, and I can't decide<br>what's better:<br><br>Amarok2 or Amarok 2<br><br>Personally I tend towards "Amarok 2" now, although initially I've<br>preferred "Amarok2". I think it would help towards a corporate
<br>identity if we could decide for one of these options.<br><br><br>Opinions?<br><br>--<br>Mark<br>_______________________________________________<br>Amarok-promo mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Amarok-promo@kde.org">Amarok-promo@kde.org
</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-promo</a><br></blockquote></div><br>