<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5.<div>But for a amarok only build, I already did some testing and got a working build with gcc 4.8.</div><div>For msvc, we are currently using msvc10, and won't switch to msvc12(which has c++11 support) before we switch to qt5.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Patrick<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:28 +0200<br>> From: edward.hades@gmail.com<br>> To: amarok-devel@kde.org<br>> Subject: Re: C++11<br>> <br>> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:<br>> > I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It has been<br>> > argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features at this<br>> > point, and that we therefore couldn't use C++11.<br>> <br>> I support going to C++11. Probably the best people to ask about compiler<br>> support are our packagers, since it is them, who'll be "enjoying" all<br>> the potential problems.<br>> <br>> Also, I believe a multi-platform buildbot would help a lot at this<br>> point. We could set it up so that it builds Amarok with a bunch of<br>> popular GCC and CLang versions to make sure we break the build on as few<br>> systems as possible.<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Edward "Hades" Toroshchin<br>> dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Amarok-devel mailing list<br>> Amarok-devel@kde.org<br>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>