<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Anmol Ahuja <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:darthcodus@gmail.com" target="_blank">darthcodus@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br>
>       - Synchronization Job<br>
<br>
Do you mean statistics synchronization? Perhaps even more useful would be to<br>
expose "Track matching job" is some way.</blockquote></div></blockquote><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Okay, I'll include Track matching job in the next revision. The SynchronizationJob is for playlist synchronization and stuff, though </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">admittedly</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> I'm not too familiar with that part of Amarok.</span></div>

</blockquote></div><div> </div><div>Sorry, realized i don't really need Synchronization jobs.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Isn't this already done by MetaTypeExporter::setImageUrl()?<br>

</div></blockquote></div><div class="im"><div> </div></div><div>It's not yet implemented. </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>It's been implemented, I must have missed it.</div><div style><br></div><div style>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br></blockquote></div><div style="font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

The proposal looks rather well, please take the GUI Scripting Creator out of<br>the proposal (remember, you can work on anything you like after the GSoC ;) ),<br></blockquote></div></div><div class="im"> </div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Can I move Script Creator to the bottom of the priority list? I won't waste too many lines of the proposal on it either.</span><br>

</div></blockquote></div><div style><div><div class="im"><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></div><div><font color="#000000"><font style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Removing Script Creator from the proposal. </font><font face="arial, sans-serif"> Instead of</font><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> improving the existing Script Console, can I make another script console in Qt instead of QtScript? Then we can use </span></font><font color="#000000" face="arial, sans-serif">KTextEditor for fancy auto-complete features and stuff instead of reinventing the wheel. Exposing widgets through QtScript doesn't seem like a good idea.</font></div>

</div></div></div></div></div></div>