<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108686/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108686/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0;">On February 1st, 2013, 2:58 a.m. UTC, <b>Wyatt Epp</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">"What would be the best approach here?"
Frankly? Scrap it; this is not good interaction. Context menus are rarely modifier modal and that's being generous (I have never seen one before now). Excepting a very few special cases (e.g. vim), modality is something to be avoided. Neither is this sort of menu something Amarok trains users for: it only happens with this one of the eight context menu arrangements I was able to find in my current layout.
Short term, revert to showing the options as before, with confirmation as you see fit. If you're concerned about accidental action, segregate them or even put them in a submenu for "permanent actions" or something to that effect.
Long term, the aim should be that nothing is possible with a context entry that isn't reversible with a simple undo. If, for some reason, things cannot be undone, that should be very clear up-front. Is there a fundamental reason that move operations aren't able to be undone? On the topic of permanent deletion, though I've personally used it in the past, I question the necessity of having it in this list. It's not available anywhere else in the interface, so its inclusion is both dangerous and without precedent. Conversely, moving to trash can be undone quite easily. Is this not sufficient?
Regards,
Wyatt</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 4th, 2013, 9:30 p.m. UTC, <b>Bjoern Balazs</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">+1</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 16th, 2013, 12:41 p.m. UTC, <b>Ralf Engels</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I agree.
Hidden menu entries is a new UI concept that I have never seen before.
If that is used wider (e.g. in whole KDE) then I am cool with it.
Currently exactly two context menues are using it. So even we are not consistent in it's use.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 17th, 2013, 11:35 a.m. UTC, <b>Bart Cerneels</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Shift for delete/move was implemented in kde's file browser already before I added this to Amarok. It's not an uncommon feature.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 17th, 2013, 11:37 a.m. UTC, <b>Matěj Laitl</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Bart, this is not about "Shift to delete/move during drop", but "Shift to show different context menu" - a very different thing.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 17th, 2013, 12:47 p.m. UTC, <b>Bart Cerneels</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">That is what I was talking about. Can someone check dolphin's behavior?</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Bart, you are right. Dolphin has it and I never noticed it.
So, it's not without precedence. Then let's add it in all places where it makes sense.</pre>
<br />
<p>- Ralf</p>
<br />
<p>On January 31st, 2013, 8:09 p.m. UTC, Edward Hades Toroshchin wrote:</p>
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/static/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.ab6f3b1072c9.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Amarok and KDE Usability.</div>
<div>By Edward Hades Toroshchin.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Jan. 31, 2013, 8:09 p.m.</i></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Some of the actions in context menu are shown only when the Shift key is pressed. We were wondering, if this were okay at all, and if yes, which hint would be better.
To explain a bit more:
in Amarok 2.5, the context menu (of a track, album etc.) used to have all the options (among others):
* Copy to Collection ->
* Move to Collection ->
* Move to Trash
* Delete
With goal to (a) make accidental data-loss (or unwanted effect) harder for novice users (b) make the context menu simpler, a fancy "hold Shift to swich to move/dangerous operations" behaviour was implemented:
- without Shift held:
* Copy to Collection -> [with "Press Shift key for ..." tooltip]
* Move to Trash [with "Press Shift key for ..." tooltip]
- with Shift key held (updates itself immediately after pressing the key):
* Move to Collection ->
* Delete
However, we discovered that discoverability (hehe) is really a problem when even experienced long-term Amarok users didn't know about the way to trigger Move/Delete. What would be the best approach here?</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
</ul>
<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108686/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">File Attachments </h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/31/hidden_actions.png">Behaviour of Amaork 2.7 with Shift key held</a></li>
<li><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/31/hint_1.png">Suggestion to improve discoverability</a></li>
<li><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/01/31/hint_2.png">Behaviour of Amarok 2.7 without any key held</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>