<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Rick W. Chen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stuffcorpse@archlinux.us">stuffcorpse@archlinux.us</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
this is to inform you I've finally finished working on the new cover<br>
fetcher (plus UI). Feel free to hack on it if you're interested.<br>
Feature-wise I'm quite happy with it. It is quite useful now and for<br>
most intended purposes should be sufficient. Please let me know what<br>
you think, bugs, ways it should be improved etc. Thanks!<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Rick</font><br clear="all"></blockquote></div><br>Hello Rick, <br><br>Thanks for implanting that discogs search engine! :) There's only one feature left I would be looking for myself and that would be storing covers in the corresponding folders instead of the (internal) database (or wherever Amarok stores them now). Due to testing and playing with up-to-date GIT versions, I wipe my database and configs on a regular base. And (obviously?) when I do that, I lose the covers which have been added by the cover manager. Having an option to store them in the folder they belong, the collectionscanner would pick them up on a re-scan and have them added again so my collection would look all nice and shiny as before.<br>
<br>I'm not sure if this is possible and if it's important enough to add, but it sure would make *me* happy. :)<br><br>-- <br>With kind regards,<br><br>Eelko Berkenpies<br>