+1 from me on 2.3 as long as it has some major improvements/changes especially the toolbar. <div><br></div><div>But I will propose to change the splash screen as well and make a 2.3 splash screen if resources are available for doing so in order users can see right from the start that the Amarok has been improved, what do you think?<div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Téo Mrnjavac <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:teo@getamarok.com">teo@getamarok.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:38, Mark Kretschmann <<a href="mailto:kretschmann@kde.org">kretschmann@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Mark Kretschmann <<a href="mailto:kretschmann@kde.org">kretschmann@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I was wondering what version number we should use for the upcoming<br>
>> Amarok release. Originally, the plan was to call it "2.2.3". I still<br>
>> think that's completely fine from a developer's perspective (because<br>
>> with Git, any release really just becomes a snapshot, more or less).<br>
>> But maybe this would be a good chance to gather some extra PR, for<br>
>> free.<br>
>><br>
>> We could simply call it "2.3", as this release sports a number of<br>
>> important changes. Most visibly that would be the toolbar, which looks<br>
>> very different from older versions. So I think we could justify the<br>
>> version jump, especially because it really is "just a name":<br>
>><br>
>> Whatever we change this version string to, be it "2.2.3", "2.3",<br>
>> "WISTA Ultimate Edition", etc, it's basically just a name anyway. We<br>
>> could simply go to "2.3", without causing a huge work overhead.<br>
>> Everything else would stay as it is now (same splash screen, same<br>
>> everything). So, if this can get us some extra PR, methinks, we might<br>
>> as well use this chance :)<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> What do you think?<br>
><br>
> So, does anyone else have opinions on this? Can we reach a consensus?<br>
><br>
</div>Both 2.3 and 2.2.3 are fine for me, I'm leaning a bit towards 2.3<br>
since it might be good for marketing.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Amarok-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Amarok-devel@kde.org">Amarok-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Milot Shala, Software Engineer<br><a href="http://www.spartansoft.org">www.spartansoft.org</a> | <a href="mailto:m.shala@spartansoft.org">m.shala@spartansoft.org</a><br>
</div></div></div>