<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Casey Link <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:unnamedrambler@gmail.com">unnamedrambler@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Jeff Mitchell <<a href="mailto:kde-dev@emailgoeshere.com">kde-dev@emailgoeshere.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Dan Meltzer wrote:<br>
>> 2) You will either need to maintain two separate build directories or<br>
>> have to deal with a full rebuild every time you switch branch checkouts.<br>
><br>
> That has not been my experience.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Ditto. It just rebuilds everything that is different between the two<br>
branches, which may require a full build but in most cases it doesn't.</blockquote><div><br>Alright, even better. <br><br>It still might make sense to maintain separate build directories between 2.0 and 2.1 as I have a feeling they will diverge fairly quickly, leaving lots of changes between the branches that require lots of rebuilding.<br>
<br>My branch setup original was with 1.4 and 2.0... No wonder it forced a full rebuild :) <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Amarok-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Amarok-devel@kde.org">Amarok-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>