<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Mark Kretschmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kretschmann@kde.org">kretschmann@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Heya,<br>
<br>
as I've already stated numerous times on IRC, I'm really unhappy with<br>
the new versioning system that we've started to deploy in Amarok 2,<br>
e.g.<br>
<br>
beta1 = 1.90<br>
<br>
I've just talked to another user who got confused by this, and this<br>
was probably the 10th time already that this happened. The old system,<br>
which we have been using very successfully for about 4 years, was<br>
simply<br>
<br>
beta1 = beta1<br>
<br>
All was fine with that system. So, if there is no compelling reason<br>
against it, I would like to switch back to the old system ASAP.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Mark Kretschmann<br>
Amarok Developer<br>
<a href="http://www.kde.org" target="_blank">www.kde.org</a> - <a href="http://amarok.kde.org" target="_blank">amarok.kde.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Amarok-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Amarok-devel@kde.org">Amarok-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>To be frank even I was myself confused with this naming system,I installed aplha2 and i was left wondering that I had installed the wrong version.Beta1 should be Beta 1 and so on IMHO because a new users might find it confusing when they download say beta 2 and after that it shows 1.9x something.<br>
</div>