[Amarok] Year += 1. It's 2010, time flies :)

[Alex Merry]

On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:14:40 Andrew Ash wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Téo Mrnjavac <teo at getamarok.com> wrote:
> > Could we use the © copyright character here instead?
> 
> I'm not sure how much Amarok follows the KDE Licensing Policy [1], but
> there was a recent blog post [2] that popped up on Planet KDE about
> the best way to do licensing statements, which had several
> suggestions:

That's important for the licence headers in the files, but it's the About 
dialog that's been changed here (which the licensing policy doesn't apply to 
anyway).

The statement that Amarok is copyright "The Amarok Development Squad" is 
meaningless legally, but kind of informative for your average human being - it 
at least gives people a general idea of where the copyright lies.  So I think 
it's fine in an About dialog, since the real information is available in the 
source code.

Alex



-- 
Why have I got six monitors?  Because I haven't got room for eight.
  -- Terry Pratchett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100107/56093847/attachment.sig