Amarok 2.2.1 tagging

Mark Kretschmann kretschmann at kde.org
Tue Nov 3 12:04:33 CET 2009


On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen
<nhnfreespirit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Some of us have recently discussed on IRC (not the best place for
>> making discussions public) if we might have to delay the release by
>> about one week. This is mostly because of concerns whether we will
>> have enough time to test major new features like the Script Updater
>> and the new Collection Scanner code. We can't really afford making any
>> mistakes with those.
>>
>> I'm not directly advocating a delay, but I think that we should get
>> used to the idea, in case something goes wrong. It wouldn't mean the
>> end of the world, IMHO.
>
> If we need to delay the release this time for the reasons you mention,
> then so be it.
>
> BUT. This is exactly the reason that there exists such a thing as
> feature freeze. If we really want to commit to this 6 week release
> schedule, we need to start respecting this and merge in our big new
> features within the first 3 week. (the sooner the better). If not,
> then delays like this will be the norm rather than the exception.
>
> I know it sucks having to sit on a feature, but with the new release
> plan, the maximum time people will have to sit on stuff is 3 weeks,
> that should be bearable.

Well, I see it more multi-faceted than black/gray:

1) It's generally good to stick to a cycle.
2) If exceptions happen, then there is no need to be anal about it.
Some flexibility is OK.

My 50 cents...

-- 
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok Developer
www.kde.org - amarok.kde.org


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list