SFC advice on our "board"

[Seb Ruiz]

2009/2/5 Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I just got a response back from the SFC in regards to our application.
> One thing they pointed out that everyone should be aware of is the
> following:
>
> ***Begin quote***
>
>> We are going through an election process of board members internally.
>> Once that is complete, one or two of the board members will be the
>> Amarok P.O.C.(s) with the Conservancy.
>
> Yeah, that sounds fine, although it's probably better to pick a name
> other than "board members".  This is because Conservancy's Board of
> Directors will effectively be the "Board" for the non-profit existence
> of Amarok if/when it becomes a member of Conservancy.  Pretty much any
> word that isn't a non-profit buzzword already should be fine.
> Committee, leadership council, anything like that.
>
> ***End quote***
>
> So, at some point we will need to decide on another name for what we've
> generally been referring to as the board.

oooh oooh, let's vote!


>
> - --Jeff
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmKWDgACgkQANYdqNCuGCVNTgCg32sRXqmWBUQ/TrVi1D0Vfc7z
> sFYAoIEAemWCMsA4CqpQbaDxvnVWOLzQ
> =qCb9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>



-- 
Seb Ruiz

http://www.sebruiz.net/
http://amarok.kde.org/